Also, Michi or anyone, which tests do we expect to be failing, especially on the cpp side of the house? Hard to evaluate patches not knowing if the non-Java errors are real or not.
thanks, C On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> wrote: > Ping me (directly at my email or via Jira tagging pls) if you have > something I could help with this weekend. Otherwise I'll poke around and > see if there's a bit I can do. > > C > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Flavio Junqueira < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Wait until we have 2125 in, pls. >> >> -Flavio >> >> > On 13 Mar 2015, at 23:30, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hi folks, any thoughts on when we should cut a release? >> > >> > Note: Michi expressed interest in being the release manager for this >> > release, so I've handed over the token to him. I will be mentoring him >> > through the process, so I'll still be around. >> > >> > Patrick >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Rakesh R <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thank you Flavio for helping us. I will wait to see your feedback. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Rakesh >> >> ________________________________ >> >> 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁 >> >> 止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中 >> >> 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！ >> >> This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from >> HUAWEI, which >> >> is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed >> above. Any use of the >> >> information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited >> to, total or partial >> >> disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the >> intended >> >> recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, >> please notify the sender by >> >> phone or email immediately and delete it! >> >> From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:[email protected]] >> >> Sent: 12 March 2015 02:09 >> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; Rakesh R >> >> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release? >> >> >> >> We should be able to have it in before the end of this week. I'm >> currently reviewing it. >> >> >> >> -Flavio >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 6:03 PM, Hongchao Deng < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> >> I think we can cut 3.5.1 for ZOOKEEPER-2125 regarding SSL. The auth >> would take too much time.Folks, please help push ZOOKEEPER-2125 and move >> this forward :) >> >> >> >> - Hongchao Deng >> >> >> >>> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> Subject: RE: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release? >> >>> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 09:54:01 +0000 >> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Hongchao/Rakesh, do you think the SSL patch should go in to >> 3.5.1? >> >>> Thanks Michi for pointing this. Right now we have agreed upon >> ZOOKEEPER-2125. Major work will be finished with this jira, will push this >> in if nobody complains/comments. Still there are few more sub-tasks to be >> completed. Will try best and see the progress in this week. I feel based on >> that will take a decision. Is that ok? >> >>> >> >>> -Rakesh >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto: >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of Michi >> Mutsuzaki >> >>> Sent: 10 March 2015 12:10 >> >>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> >>> Subject: Re: Time for a 3.5.1-alpha release? >> >>> >> >>> It would be great if somebody can review ZOOKEEPER-1506. >> >>> Hongchao/Rakesh, do you think the SSL patch should go in to 3.5.1? >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>> Hi folks, just checking in. Any reason we shouldn't do a release in >> >>>> the near future? Anything pending that absolutely needs to get in? >> >>>> >> >>>> Patrick >> >>>> >> >>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>>> Sounds reasonable. Let's try to get these in, but depending on how >> >>>>> much progress we make we might need to cut off at some point an push >> >>>>> a release. They can always catch the next train. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> I'll try to update the jira list over the weekend, clean them up and >> >>>>> see where we are. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Patrick >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>>>> I'd like to get ZOOKEEPER-1506 in. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Flavio Junqueira < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>>>>> I'd like to see the SSL work in for the next release. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -Flavio >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 05 Feb 2015, at 19:34, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> It would be nice, but they are not blockers, to get these in: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1998 >> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2051 >> >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2098 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> thanks Patrick! >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> -rgs >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 5 February 2015 at 11:22, Michi Mutsuzaki < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> +1 I can check in ZOOKEEPER-1366 tonight. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan >> >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> +1 for 3.5.1-alpha release >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I think its good to include the following jira issues: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1366 (so far we got two +1) >> >>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-1907 (its not blocking, good to have imprv) >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >> >>>>>>>>>> Rakesh >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Patrick Hunt < >> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks. 3.5.0-alpha has been out for a bit now, we've gotten >> >>>>>>>>>>> some good feedback and a number of jira issues have been >> >>>>>>>>>>> resolved. What do you think about putting out an updated >> >>>>>>>>>>> 3.5.1-alpha release with the latest changes? Anything blocking >> >>>>>>>>>>> us or that you feel important to include? >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards, >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Patrick >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >
