What's strange about the issues resolved? -Flavio
> On 18 Apr 2015, at 20:19, Hongchao Deng <[email protected]> wrote: > > TBH the commits from 3.4.6 to latest look a little strange to me. I don't > think I could take that responsibility. I would like to do the RM job for > 3.5.2 :) > - Hongchao Deng > >> From: [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:30:13 -0700 >> Subject: Re: zookeeper-3.4.7 timeframe >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> >> One of our new committers perhaps? Hongchao or Raul interested? >> >> Patrick >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Flavio Junqueira < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have volunteered to RM 3.4.7, but I'm more than happy to pass if anyone >>> else wants to do a release. >>> -Flavio >>> >>> >>> On Friday, April 17, 2015 8:22 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Konstantin, >>> >>> Yes, I'd like us to start preparing for 3.4.7 soon. We have 36 out of >>> 44 issues resolved. Any volunteer to manage the 3.4.7 release? I'd >>> like to get more committers to get familiarized with the release >>> process. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hello ZK team! >>>> >>>> We are looking into upgrading ZK to 3.4.6 in the coming Bigtop 1.0 >>> release. >>>> However, as expressed in BIGTOP-1468, we are concerned a bit about >>> deviating >>>> from 'official release only' policy we had so far. But as explained >>> above, >>>> there are a few issues that are we need to address if we want to switch: >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1911 >>>> ZOOKEEPER-2064 >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1506 (potentially) >>>> >>>> I was wondering if you guys are planning on releasing 3.4.7 soon, that >>> will >>>> hopefully address at least the top two issues? I am not subscribed to >>>> [email protected] so I'd appreciate if you can include [email protected] >>> into >>>> your reply as well. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> Cos >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
