By "strange" I mean "not familiar with" :) - Hongchao Deng
> Subject: Re: zookeeper-3.4.7 timeframe > From: [email protected] > Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 17:26:34 +0100 > To: [email protected] > > What's strange about the issues resolved? > > -Flavio > > > On 18 Apr 2015, at 20:19, Hongchao Deng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > TBH the commits from 3.4.6 to latest look a little strange to me. I don't > > think I could take that responsibility. I would like to do the RM job for > > 3.5.2 :) > > - Hongchao Deng > > > >> From: [email protected] > >> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:30:13 -0700 > >> Subject: Re: zookeeper-3.4.7 timeframe > >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] > >> > >> One of our new committers perhaps? Hongchao or Raul interested? > >> > >> Patrick > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:20 AM, Flavio Junqueira < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I have volunteered to RM 3.4.7, but I'm more than happy to pass if anyone > >>> else wants to do a release. > >>> -Flavio > >>> > >>> > >>> On Friday, April 17, 2015 8:22 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki < > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hi Konstantin, > >>> > >>> Yes, I'd like us to start preparing for 3.4.7 soon. We have 36 out of > >>> 44 issues resolved. Any volunteer to manage the 3.4.7 release? I'd > >>> like to get more committers to get familiarized with the release > >>> process. > >>> > >>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> Hello ZK team! > >>>> > >>>> We are looking into upgrading ZK to 3.4.6 in the coming Bigtop 1.0 > >>> release. > >>>> However, as expressed in BIGTOP-1468, we are concerned a bit about > >>> deviating > >>>> from 'official release only' policy we had so far. But as explained > >>> above, > >>>> there are a few issues that are we need to address if we want to switch: > >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1911 > >>>> ZOOKEEPER-2064 > >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1506 (potentially) > >>>> > >>>> I was wondering if you guys are planning on releasing 3.4.7 soon, that > >>> will > >>>> hopefully address at least the top two issues? I am not subscribed to > >>>> [email protected] so I'd appreciate if you can include [email protected] > >>> into > >>>> your reply as well. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks in advance! > >>>> Cos > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > >
