The initial migration did take some effort, but afterwards the migration was generally well-received in the Hadoop community.
One thing to keep in mind is that git offers so much more flexibility that it probably makes sense for all committers to agree on a particular workflow. See here for more details on Hadoop's git workflow: http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/GitAndHadoop http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToCommit --Chris Nauroth On 5/17/15, 8:08 AM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]> wrote: >We are using git in the BookKeeper project, it has been working fine for >us. >-Flavio > > > > On Sunday, May 17, 2015 5:59 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I was reading an article about hadoop migrating from svn to git, and >started wondering if we should consider migrating to git. Do you guys >think it's worth all the hassle (I'm guessing the migration involves a >fair amount of work) to migrate to git, or should we continue using >svn? I'll open an official vote if there is enough interest to migrate >to git. > >https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/196-zonker/787127-apache-hadoop- >transitions-to-git > > > >
