+1 for git. It took me a little while to fully grok some of the features of git, but I've never found myself missing SVN. However there have been a number of occasions where I was using SVN or CVS, and really wished it was git. Complex merges, and renaming files/directories are obvious cases, but just being able to locally manage changes when experimenting is very useful. Not to mention cherry-picking single changes, rebasing changes on top of other's commits, and managing multiple upstream (or downstream) repos.
I'm already using: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper Cheers! .timrc -------------------------------------------- On Mon, 5/18/15, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: Re: [discuss] migrating to git To: [email protected] Date: Monday, May 18, 2015, 1:51 PM On May 16, 2015 11:59 PM, "Michi Mutsuzaki" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was reading an article about hadoop migrating from svn to git, and > started wondering if we should consider migrating to git. Do you guys > think it's worth all the hassle (I'm guessing the migration involves a > fair amount of work) to migrate to git, or should we continue using > svn? I'll open an official vote if there is enough interest to migrate > to git. > > https://www.linux.com/news/featured-blogs/196-zonker/787127-apache-hadoop-transitions-to-git +1, git would ease up so many things (chunking up big reviews, streamlining small pull requests, etc.). -rgs
