Sounds reasonable. I have reached out personally in the past, but having it be automated would be good. Perhaps you can discuss with the apache infra team as to what is possible?
Patrick On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> wrote: > One final note for posterity and people interested in using PRs for the > review process > at least (which I guess is ok) is that the ASF GitHub Bot will actually > ping the associated > JIRA if you reference it from your PR, i.e.; > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2168 > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/33 > > I guess it would be nice if the Bot also commented on PRs pointing out > to the `How to Contribute` link or simply saying that you need to create a > JIRA and > then you can reference it from your PR. > > > -rgs > > On 8 June 2015 at 10:09, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 8 June 2015 at 10:07, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Keep in mind that filing the jira, attaching the patch file, etc... >>> are all demonstrating intent of the author to contribute the changes >>> under the apache license conditions. Jira is part of IP tracking. If >>> you file the jira for them we lose that. We used to (olden days) have >>> a specific checkbox in jira that required the patch author to >>> explicitly specify intent, but at some point that was dropped. >>> >>> So don't file the jira for someone else. Let them create the jira, >>> attach the patch, etc... - regardless they are going to need to >>> interact with jira in order to work through the feedback, discussions, >>> etc... >>> >> >> Cool. Thanks Pat, Camille and Chris! >> >> >> -rgs >> >>
