On 8 June 2015 at 11:13, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds reasonable. I have reached out personally in the past, but > having it be automated would be good. Perhaps you can discuss with the > apache infra team as to what is possible? >
Yeah, I'll ping them and get back to this thread with what's possible. -rgs > > Patrick > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés > <[email protected]> wrote: > > One final note for posterity and people interested in using PRs for the > > review process > > at least (which I guess is ok) is that the ASF GitHub Bot will actually > > ping the associated > > JIRA if you reference it from your PR, i.e.; > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2168 > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/33 > > > > I guess it would be nice if the Bot also commented on PRs pointing out > > to the `How to Contribute` link or simply saying that you need to create > a > > JIRA and > > then you can reference it from your PR. > > > > > > -rgs > > > > On 8 June 2015 at 10:09, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On 8 June 2015 at 10:07, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Keep in mind that filing the jira, attaching the patch file, etc... > >>> are all demonstrating intent of the author to contribute the changes > >>> under the apache license conditions. Jira is part of IP tracking. If > >>> you file the jira for them we lose that. We used to (olden days) have > >>> a specific checkbox in jira that required the patch author to > >>> explicitly specify intent, but at some point that was dropped. > >>> > >>> So don't file the jira for someone else. Let them create the jira, > >>> attach the patch, etc... - regardless they are going to need to > >>> interact with jira in order to work through the feedback, discussions, > >>> etc... > >>> > >> > >> Cool. Thanks Pat, Camille and Chris! > >> > >> > >> -rgs > >> > >> >
