[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15006497#comment-15006497
]
Steve Loughran commented on ZOOKEEPER-2139:
-------------------------------------------
OK. In that situation, if you actually be two different kerberos principals on
the client, then we should have ZK handle it —as that has to be one of the key
use cases, along with "one connection SASL, one connection not-SASL".
> Zookeeper client configuration should not be java system property
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2139
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2139
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: java client
> Affects Versions: 3.5.0
> Reporter: Surendra Singh Lilhore
> Assignee: Arshad Mohammad
> Fix For: 3.5.2, 3.6.0
>
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2139-05.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2139.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2139.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2139_1.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2139_2.patch
>
>
> I have two ZK client in one JVM, one is secure client and second is normal
> client (For non secure cluster).
> "zookeeper.sasl.client" system property is "true" by default, because of this
> my second client connection is failing.
> We should pass all client configurations in client constructor like HDFS
> client.
> For example :
> {code}
> public ZooKeeper(String connectString, int sessionTimeout, Watcher watcher,
> Configuration conf) throws IOException
> {
> ......
> ......
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
