Quick question, ZK-2125 depends on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2069 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2072?
It seems to be given the description of ZK-2063... Regards Luciano On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you're talking about porting the patch of ZK-2125. I haven't > really assessed how much work it would be to backport it, but it is > possibly not hard. > > -Flavio > > > On 01 Jul 2016, at 15:54, Luciano Afranllie <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Thanks Flavio > > > > What about back porting in our own private fork while we wait for the > 3.5? > > I would like your help understanding how easy/difficult this may be. > > > > Regards > > Luciano > > > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Luciano, > >> > >> The 3.4 branch is stable and we are only releasing bug fixes at this > >> point, so it is currently not an option to back port. > >> > >> We are all pretty eager to see the 3.5 branch stable, and we are in the > >> process of voting the release candidate for 3.5.2, but that's still > tagged > >> as alpha. We don't have a current plan for 3.5.3 yet, but I believe no > one > >> here wants to wait too long have it out. I suspect that it won't be > before > >> 3 months from now given the pace that we have been releasing, though. > >> > >> -Flavio > >> > >> > >>> On 01 Jul 2016, at 13:07, Luciano Afranllie <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi there > >>> > >>> We are in the need to have SSL support in Zookeeper in order for our > >>> solution to be FIPS complaint. > >>> > >>> Of course one option is to wait for 3.5 to be released but given we > are a > >>> little bit time constrained we want to consider an alternative of > >>> backporting SSL support from 3.5 to 3.4 (we are using 3.4.8) > >>> > >>> Do you think this is doable? Can you please tell me the impact of doing > >>> this and if you think it is a viable alternative? We have experience > with > >>> Java but not with ZK at development level. > >>> > >>> Of, course if you have a rough estimate about when ZK 3.5 may be > released > >>> that may help in our decision too. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> Luciano > >> > >> > >
