Hi Andrew. We've hashed through this a few times in the last couple months, not sure if you're following on the list. Summary:
Primary gates are captured on the jira, the dashboard gives a good overview https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12327688 Blocker issues in particular: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12336873&jql=project%20%3D%20ZOOKEEPER%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(3.5.1%2C%203.5.2%2C%203.5.3)%20AND%20priority%20in%20(Blocker)%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC Patrick On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Do you have any sense of when a release post 3.4 will not be tagged alpha? > We really can't consider upgrading a production setting until this happens. > What are the gating factors? > > > On Jul 1, 2016, at 5:23 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Luciano, > > > > The 3.4 branch is stable and we are only releasing bug fixes at this > point, so it is currently not an option to back port. > > > > We are all pretty eager to see the 3.5 branch stable, and we are in the > process of voting the release candidate for 3.5.2, but that's still tagged > as alpha. We don't have a current plan for 3.5.3 yet, but I believe no one > here wants to wait too long have it out. I suspect that it won't be before > 3 months from now given the pace that we have been releasing, though. > > > > -Flavio > > > > > >> On 01 Jul 2016, at 13:07, Luciano Afranllie <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi there > >> > >> We are in the need to have SSL support in Zookeeper in order for our > >> solution to be FIPS complaint. > >> > >> Of course one option is to wait for 3.5 to be released but given we are > a > >> little bit time constrained we want to consider an alternative of > >> backporting SSL support from 3.5 to 3.4 (we are using 3.4.8) > >> > >> Do you think this is doable? Can you please tell me the impact of doing > >> this and if you think it is a viable alternative? We have experience > with > >> Java but not with ZK at development level. > >> > >> Of, course if you have a rough estimate about when ZK 3.5 may be > released > >> that may help in our decision too. > >> > >> Regards > >> Luciano > > >
