+1 (non-binding)

shasum and md5sum are valid. PGP signature is valid.

Java unit tests pass and was able to successfully test against a 3 server 
ensemble.

Abe

> On Aug 23, 2016, at 4:20 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> +1 xsum/sig are valid. RAT ran clean. I was able to compile the code and
> successfully put a few ensemble sizes through their paces.
> 
> fwiw I also did a "diff" btw 3.4.8 release artifact and this rc. There were
> a number of changed files, obviously. However I did not notice any missing
> files, as we've seen with the previous rcs in this release candidate line.
> afaict this artifact has all the right contents - i.e. similar to previous
> releases.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:24 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> This is the third release candidate for 3.4.9. This candidate removes the
>> extra *.asc files found in the
>> second candidate.
>> 
>> This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.9. It fixes 21 issues, including
>> issues that affect ACL cache
>> in DataTree never removes entries, prevent multiple init of login object in
>> each ZKSaslClient instance,
>> ZK service becomes unavailable when leader fails to write transaction log,
>> upgrade netty version due
>> to security vulnerability (CVE-2014-3488) and others.
>> 
>> The full release notes are available at:
>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
>> projectId=12310801&version=12334700
>> 
>> *** Please download, test and vote by August 30th 2016, 23:59 UTC+0. ***
>> 
>> Source files:
>> http://people.apache.org/~rakeshr/zookeeper-3.4.9-candidate-2
>> 
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/
>> apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.4.9
>> 
>> The tag to be voted upon:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/tags/release-3.4.9-rc2
>> 
>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
>> 
>> Should we release this candidate?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Rakesh
>> 

Reply via email to