[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15598481#comment-15598481
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-761:
------------------------------------------

Github user hanm commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/90#discussion_r84585224
  
    --- Diff: src/c/include/zookeeper.h ---
    @@ -2000,6 +2001,7 @@ ZOOAPI int zoo_set_acl(zhandle_t *zh, const char 
*path, int version,
      * \ref zoo_acreate, \ref zoo_adelete, \ref zoo_aset).
      */
     ZOOAPI int zoo_multi(zhandle_t *zh, int count, const zoo_op_t *ops, 
zoo_op_result_t *results);
    +#endif
    --- End diff --
    
    +1


> Remove *synchronous* calls from the *single-threaded* C clieant API, since 
> they are documented not to work
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-761
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-761
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: c client
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.1, 3.2.2
>         Environment: RHEL 4u8 (Linux).  The issue is not OS-specific though.
>            Reporter: Jozef Hatala
>            Assignee: Benjamin Reed
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.5.3, 3.6.0
>
>         Attachments: fix-sync-apis-in-st-adaptor.patch, 
> fix-sync-apis-in-st-adaptor.v2.patch
>
>
> Since the synchronous calls are 
> [known|http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/current/zookeeperProgrammers.html#Using+the+C+Client]
>  to be unimplemented in the single threaded version of the client library 
> libzookeeper_st.so, I believe that it would be helpful towards users of the 
> library if that information was also obvious from the header file.
> Anecdotally more than one of us here made the mistake of starting by using 
> the synchronous calls with the single-threaded library, and we found 
> ourselves debugging it.  An early warning would have been greatly appreciated.
> 1. Could you please add warnings to the doxygen blocks of all synchronous 
> calls saying that they are not available in the single-threaded API.  This 
> cannot be safely done with {{#ifdef THREADED}}, obviously, because the same 
> header file is included whichever client library implementation one is 
> compiling for.
> 2. Could you please bracket the implementation of all synchronous calls in 
> zookeeper.c with {{#ifdef THREADED}} and {{#endif}}, so that those symbols 
> are not present in libzookeeper_st.so?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to