[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15739945#comment-15739945
]
Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2642:
---------------------------------------------
Are these tests known to be flakey? They work on my machine and a message such
as "junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Threads didn't join" seems suspicious
to me.
> ZOOKEEPER-2014 breaks existing clients for little benefit
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-2642
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2642
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: c client, java client
> Affects Versions: 3.5.2
> Reporter: Jordan Zimmerman
> Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
> Attachments: ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch, ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch,
> ZOOKEEPER-2642.patch
>
>
> ZOOKEEPER-2014 moved the reconfig() methods into a new class, ZooKeeperAdmin.
> It appears this was done to document that these are methods have access
> restrictions. However, this change breaks Apache Curator (and possibly other
> clients). Curator APIs will have to be changed and/or special methods need to
> be added. A breaking change of this kind should only be done when the benefit
> is overwhelming. In this case, the same information can be conveyed with
> documentation and possibly a deprecation notice.
> Revert the creation of the ZooKeeperAdmin class and move the reconfig()
> methods back to the ZooKeeper class with additional documentation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
