+1 Tests passed for me. Started zk in standalone and in cluster mode. Used command-line for my tests, java version "1.8.0_121".
Minor comment: the artifact ending with .tar.gz is not a gzip archive but a tar. -Sandeep On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 xsum/sig verified, RAT ran clean. Tests passed for me. I started a few > different cluster sizes, ran the command line client and it all seemed > fine. > > Patrick > > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Michael Han <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > This is the second release candidate (RC1) of 3.5.3-beta, following the > > first release candidate (RC0) cut off last week [1]. It fixes incorrect > > Implementation-Version information contained in the manifest file of the > > generated artifacts. There is no code changes, just regenerated and > > resigned artifacts. > > > > The full release notes are available at: > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > > projectId=12310801&version=12335444 > > > > **** Please download, test and vote by April 8th 2017, 23:59 UTC+0. **** > > > > Source files: > > https://home.apache.org/~hanm/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.3-beta-rc1/ > > > > Maven staging repo: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/ > > apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.5.3-beta/ > > > > The tag to be voted upon: > > *https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.5.3-rc1 > > <https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.5.3-rc1>* > > > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS > > > > Should we release this candidate? > > > > [1] > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-dev/ > 201703.mbox/%3CCA% > > 2Bi0x1LTONuaT6H%2BiOHAT2O1SVPKnQzzQh8vKMzWJVijCrHUrw%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > > > -- > > Cheers > > Michael. > > >
