Did you import the KEYS?

Patrick

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote:

> Michael,
>
> I can't verify the signature of the RC:
>
> $ gpg2 --verify zookeeper-3.5.3-beta.tar.gz.asc
> zookeeper-3.5.3-beta.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Mon Apr  3 18:39:14 2017 CEST using RSA key ID 767E7473
> gpg: requesting key 767E7473 from hkp server keys.gnupg.net
> : can't connect to `keys.gnupg.net': host not found
> gpgkeys: HTTP fetch error 7: couldn't connect: Not found
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Is there anything I'm doing wrong?
>
> -Flavio
>
> > On 03 Apr 2017, at 19:26, Michael Han <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is the second release candidate (RC1) of 3.5.3-beta, following the
> > first release candidate (RC0) cut off last week [1]. It fixes incorrect
> > Implementation-Version information contained in the manifest file of the
> > generated artifacts. There is no code changes, just regenerated and
> > resigned artifacts.
> >
> > The full release notes are available at:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > projectId=12310801&version=12335444
> >
> > **** Please download, test and vote by April 8th 2017, 23:59 UTC+0. ****
> >
> > Source files:
> > https://home.apache.org/~hanm/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.3-beta-rc1/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/
> > apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.5.3-beta/
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> > *https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.5.3-rc1
> > <https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.5.3-rc1>*
> >
> > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS
> >
> > Should we release this candidate?
> >
> > [1]
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/zookeeper-dev/
> 201703.mbox/%3CCA%2Bi0x1LTONuaT6H%2BiOHAT2O1SVPKnQzzQh8vKMzWJVij
> CrHUrw%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > --
> > Cheers
> > Michael.
>
>

Reply via email to