>> I thought we were moving to Maven at some point. Did that get sidelined?
I think moving to maven is still the plan and there are definitely lots of interests on this - see ZOOKEEPER-1078 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1078> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com > wrote: > I thought we were moving to Maven at some point. Did that get sidelined? > > -Jordan > > > On May 5, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Michael Han <h...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > > Is this proposal intended to use BUCK to replace ant someday, or just add > > BUCK as an alternative build system? I thought it's not replacing ant, > but > > I want double check, because choosing a build system vs support multiple > > build system are different topics. > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Patrick White <pwh...@fb.com> wrote: > > > >> My bad, I'll clarify. > >> > >> > >> Internally, we build and test with buck, but we don't worry about the > >> bin,conf,share,etc folders. So it's a thing that is possible (and I'll > >> certainly do it if there's interest) we just haven't put effort behind > it > >> because... well we don't use it that way. > >> > >> re: jenkins. uhhhh... I'll have to get back to you on that one. (never > >> used it, but I'll go download it and see what shakes loose) > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Camille Fournier <cami...@apache.org> > >> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:11:15 PM > >> To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Ever considered using buck to build? > >> > >> Did you... Just list as a con that actually it currently won't work? > >> > >> Does it work on Jenkins? > >> > >> On May 5, 2017 4:51 PM, "Patrick White" <pwh...@fb.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Howdy! I'm Patrick from the core systems team at Facebook, and I work > on > >>> ZooKeeper and ZooKeeper accessories all day long. > >>> > >>> Proposal: I want to add BUCK files to the zookeeper source tree. > >>> > >>> > >>> Hear me out: > >>> > >>> TL; DR - I want to hear everyone's thoughts and opinions on the matter. > >>> > >>> > >>> At Facebook, we use buck (buckbuild.com) to build everything. Buck > turns > >>> out to be a really nice build system. It's easy to set up and super > >> fast. I > >>> love buck. > >>> > >>> > >>> Ben put together some nice BUCK files that we use internally to build > >>> zookeeper and zkcli. Since we're already working to sync back with > >>> upstream, we'd love to get them in. > >>> > >>> > >>> Pros: > >>> > >>> Buck files are a lot easier to work with than maven, ant, or anything > >> else > >>> > >>> Buck's fast > >>> > >>> These files do absolutely nothing for or against people who want to use > >>> maven or ant > >>> > >>> 'java_binary' generates a single executable file containing all the > jars > >>> > >>> > >>> Cons: > >>> > >>> Not one of the "conventional" java build systems > >>> > >>> BUCK files laying around are just trash for people not interested in > them > >>> > >>> Doesn't currently generate the typical layout of bin, conf, share, etc. > >>> > >>> - *currently*, it could probably be done > >>> > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Patrick > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers > > Michael. > > -- Cheers Michael.
