ic - thanks! Patrick
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:38 AM Justin Ling Mao <[email protected]> wrote: > ---> "That's cool, thanks Justin. I'd be interested to know - did you use > the legacy/old c client binaries from the github repo or did you rebuild > them? What about zkpython itself? I could see benefits or either/both." > @PatrickTo use that(your) benchmark tool, I did something like > following:cd zookeeper-3.5.5/src/c./configuremake make install# bulid > zkpython from source code:wget > https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/14/38/a761465ab0a154405c11f7e5d6e81edf6e84584e114e152fddd340f7d6d3/zkpython-0.4.2.tar.gzpython > setup.py installexport LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/then I cd the > zk-smoketest dir,exec the following:./zk-latencies.py --servers > "localhost:2181" --root_znode="/zk-latencies_666" --znode_count=10000 > --znode_size=100 --synchronous > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> > To: DevZooKeeper <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Subject: Re: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2 > Date: 2019-04-08 12:24 > > > > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:47 PM Justin Ling Mao <[email protected]> > wrote: > Test for the 3.5.5 candidate 2: > -[0]: Jepsen consistency check had passed. +1. Look at the > attachment: jepsen_test_report.txt. how to use it: > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/883 > -[1] <https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/883-%5B1%5D>: zk smoke and > latencies test passed, comparing to 3.5.4-beta, no any notable perfermance > improvement .+1. The tool: https://github.com/phunt/zk-smoketest > Env: 8 cores + 16GB Memory + 256GB SSD(my local Mac Pro 2015) > java version:"1.8.0_191" Look at the benchmark report: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QnADbG9bCGMyTorEi67jQXWQSUVXQ1yQADgLV4LJHcg/edit#gid=0 > That's cool, thanks Justin. I'd be interested to know - did you use the > legacy/old c client binaries from the github repo or did you rebuild them? > What about zkpython itself? I could see benefits or either/both. > Regards, > Patrick -[2]: zkCli test passed.(base operation:create,set,get,delete > ...etc) +1. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> > To: DevZooKeeper <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.5 candidate 2 > Date: 2019-04-06 17:49 > > Tamas, > Il sab 6 apr 2019, 10:47 Tamas Penzes <[email protected]> ha > scritto: > > Hi Enrico, > > > > Just my 2cents. > > > > Having the sources jars in the binary package can be useful if you want > to > > debug without downloading the source tarball or checking out the whole > > project from github. In the same time it is not needed on the classpath. > > > > The docs html is generated from md files now, but the design didn't get > > updated. I wanted to do it (to have the same design as the website), but > > never had time for that. It doesn't look a blocker for me, can be done in > > any release later. > > > I agree, not all my points are blockers. > The most critical point is that the source tarball does not reflect the tag > and, important files are missing. > Cheers > Enrico > > Regards, Tamaas > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 17:37 Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > -1 (non binding) > > > > > > Good news: > > > I have build the sources with jdk-8 and all tests passed > > > checksums and signatures are ok > > > I run a few smoke tests running on JDK11, all is ok > > > > > > Bad news: > > > I see the following problems in the "binary package", not all blockers: > > > - we have a lib/cobertura directory, not useful > > > - we have zookeeper-3.5.5-sources.jar not needed in the "binary" > > > package on the classpath > > > - we also have all of the 'recipes' not needed in the "binary" package > > > on the classpath > > > - inside the "docs" directory I see a webside with a very old look and > > feel > > > > > > The source package does not reflect the repository, for instance > > > build.xml file, owaspSuppressions.xml, > > > excludeFindBugsFilter.xml.....are missing. > > > I think we have to release in a "source package" a clean copy of ASF > > > repository at the released "git tag" > > > > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il giorno ven 5 apr 2019 alle ore 14:35 Andor Molnar > > > <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > > > > > This is the first stable release of 3.5 branch: 3.5.5. It resolves > 117 > > > issues, including Maven migration, Quorum TLS, TTL nodes and lots of > > other > > > performance and stability improvements. > > > > > > > > The full release notes is available at: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12343268 > > > > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by April 12th 2019, 23:59 UTC+0. > *** > > > > > > > > Source files: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.5-rc2/ > > > > > > > > Maven staging repos: > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/parent/3.5.5/ > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper-jute/3.5.5/ > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.5.5/ > > > > > > > > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.5.5-rc2 > > > > > > > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS > > > > > > > > Should we release this candidate? > > > > > > > > > > > >
