I'm also +1 for adding a comment to the release notes (thanks for the suggestion, Ted). Updating the readme makes sense, but the release notes will be the main source to indicate that we require a specific or later version of Java from that particular release. My preference would be to update the release notes.
As for running TLS on a single node, have you been able to do it? I haven't had a chance to look further into it throughout my day, so if anyone has successfully done it and can share some instructions, it would help me. Otherwise, I'll keep investigating once I have a chance. To be specific, I created the keystore, certificate and truststore files according to instructions, but the instructions assume that the aliases are different when it comes to populating the truststore. At that point, I had to get creative and I have tried a couple of options that didn't work. Either way, I think that being able to run locally and documenting is desirable, although not a blocker. If I can get it right, then I can write a gist describing it that we can use as a reference until we properly document it. -Flavio > On 29 Apr 2019, at 15:42, Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thanks Flavio for the investigation. I’ll update the README file to include > instructions on supported Java 8 versions. > I’m wondering if I have to update the admin docs based on your problems > running TLS quorum on a single machine. > > Andor > > > >> On 2019. Apr 29., at 15:06, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Il lun 29 apr 2019, 13:44 Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >>> Other changes in u211+ substantially improve how Java 8 applications behave >>> in containers. I am seeing this more and more with customers. >>> >>> Combined with the crypto issues, it might be worth a release note >>> suggesting that if you are going to compile with Java 1.8, you should use a >>> recent release at u211 (u212?) Or above. >>> >> >> +1 for a note on release docs >> >> >> Enrico >> >> >> >> >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019, 11:43 AM Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I did a bit more research and it turns out that the crypto.policy option >>>> was introduced u151: >>>> >>>> >>> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u151-relnotes-3850493.html >>>> < >>>> >>> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u151-relnotes-3850493.html >>>>> >>>> >>>> And started being defined by default with the "unlimited" option in u161: >>>> >>>> >>> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u161-relnotes-4021379.html >>>> < >>>> >>> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/8u161-relnotes-4021379.html >>>>> >>>> >>>> I have installed a more recent version, 1.8.0_211, and it builds fine >>> (all >>>> tests pass consistently for me). >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm now trying to start an ensemble with ssl enabled locally, but it is >>>> failing for me. It looks like the instructions in the admin doc assumes >>>> different hosts. I need to look more closely into it to determine what >>> not >>>> is that I'm doing wrong, but in any case, the instructions do not make it >>>> very clear whether one can run locally. >>>> >>>> -Flavio >>>> >>>>> On 27 Apr 2019, at 19:28, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Odd. I had done my testing on jdk11/macos which is fine. >>>>> >>>>> I just tried jdk8 and 3 times in a row it's failing with: >>>>> [ERROR] SaslAuthTest.testZKOperationsAfterClientSaslAuthFailure:176 » >>>>> Timeout Failed t... >>>>> >>>>> I don't see the error Flavio is seeing. I have never installed special >>>>> crypto libraries, etc... just vanilla jdk. >>>>> >>>>> ⌂102% [phunt:~/Downloads/z/apache-zookeeper-3.5.5] 3s $ mvn --version >>>>> Apache Maven 3.6.1 (d66c9c0b3152b2e69ee9bac180bb8fcc8e6af555; >>>>> 2019-04-04T12:00:29-07:00) >>>>> Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.6.1/libexec >>>>> Java version: 1.8.0_201, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: >>>>> /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_201.jdk/Contents/Home/jre >>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 >>>>> OS name: "mac os x", version: "10.14.4", arch: "x86_64", family: "mac" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2019-04-27 10:11:51,635 [myid:] - INFO >>>>> [NIOWorkerThread-6:SaslServerCallbackHandler@136] - Setting >>>> authorizedID: >>>>> super >>>>> 2019-04-27 10:11:51,636 [myid:] - INFO >>>>> [NIOWorkerThread-6:ZooKeeperServer@1170] - adding SASL authorization >>> for >>>>> authorizationID: super >>>>> 2019-04-27 10:11:51,813 [myid:] - INFO >>>>> [SessionTracker:SessionTrackerImpl@163] - SessionTrackerImpl exited >>>> loop! >>>>> 2019-04-27 10:12:21,596 [myid:] - INFO >>>>> [main:JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod@98] - TEST METHOD FAILED >>>>> testZKOperationsAfterClientSaslAuthFailure >>>>> java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Failed to connect to ZooKeeper >>>>> server. >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:150) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.SaslAuthTest.testZKOperationsAfterClientSaslAuthFailure(SaslAuthTest.java:176) >>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) >>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:50) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 8:54 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On my local tests I usually don't get the error because I am using >>>>>> jdk11 and unlimited strength cryptography is enabled by default >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/jdk11-readme-5097204.html#jce >>>>>> >>>>>> In production it depends on the configuration of SSL, if you require >>>>>> strong ciphers/big keys you will have problems, but the server won't >>>>>> start so you will find soon the problem. >>>>>> I think this is not a real issue (for production I mean). >>>>>> I see these ways: >>>>>> 1) adapt the tests in order to make default jdk8 happy >>>>>> 2) tweak the tests enabling "unlimited strenght cryptography" using >>>>>> reflection >>>>>> 3) just write a line in documentation that says that in order to make >>>>>> tests pass you have to enable the flag >>>>>> >>>>>> That flag is deprecated and enabled by default in modern JREs, so I >>>>>> would go for 2) or 3) >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess that on ASF Jenkins if the JDK8 we are using has the flag >>>> turned >>>>>> on >>>>>> >>>>>> Enrico >>>>>> >>>>>> Il giorno sab 27 apr 2019 alle ore 17:48 Andor Molnar >>>>>> <an...@apache.org> ha scritto: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I’m running the tests fine without setting the policy to unlimited: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> java version "1.8.0_161" >>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_161-b12) >>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.161-b12, mixed mode) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have you tried to run it with a more recent version of Java? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andor >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2019. Apr 27., at 17:33, Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good catch, thanks Flavio for reporting this. We need to double >>> check >>>>>> the tests with Ilya I believe. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Having tests failure means that you were actually able to _build_ >>>>>> ZooKeeper successfully without changing the crypto policy setting. >>> Have >>>> you >>>>>> tried to start an ensemble with Quorum TLS by any chance? That would >>> add >>>>>> some more color to this issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This might be just a testing issue. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Andor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2019. Apr 27., at 16:09, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Enrico, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here is the info you are requesting: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Java version* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> $ java -version >>>>>>>>> java version "1.8.0_152" >>>>>>>>> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_152-b16) >>>>>>>>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.152-b16, mixed mode) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Test case errors* >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I won’t post all of them, I get a good number of errors: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ================================ >>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Tests run: 64, Failures: 0, Errors: 16, Skipped: 0, Time >>>>>> elapsed: 9.21 s <<< FAILURE! - in >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest >>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> >>>> >>> testLoadCertificateFromKeyStore[1](org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest) >>>>>> Time elapsed: 1.593 s <<< ERROR! >>>>>>>>> java.io.IOException: >>>>>> org.bouncycastle.operator.OperatorCreationException: Illegal key size >>> or >>>>>> default parameters >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest.testLoadCertificateFromKeyStore(PemReaderTest.java:125) >>>>>>>>> Caused by: org.bouncycastle.operator.OperatorCreationException: >>>>>> Illegal key size or default parameters >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest.testLoadCertificateFromKeyStore(PemReaderTest.java:125) >>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.security.InvalidKeyException: Illegal key size or >>>>>> default parameters >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest.testLoadCertificateFromKeyStore(PemReaderTest.java:125) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [ERROR] >>>>>> >>>> >>> testLoadEncryptedPrivateKeyFromKeyStoreWithWrongPassword[1](org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest) >>>>>> Time elapsed: 0.004 s <<< ERROR! >>>>>>>>> java.lang.Exception: Unexpected exception, >>>>>> expected<java.security.GeneralSecurityException> but >>>>>> was<java.io.IOException> >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest.testLoadEncryptedPrivateKeyFromKeyStoreWithWrongPassword(PemReaderTest.java:93) >>>>>>>>> Caused by: org.bouncycastle.operator.OperatorCreationException: >>>>>> Illegal key size or default parameters >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest.testLoadEncryptedPrivateKeyFromKeyStoreWithWrongPassword(PemReaderTest.java:93) >>>>>>>>> Caused by: java.security.InvalidKeyException: Illegal key size or >>>>>> default parameters >>>>>>>>> at >>>>>> >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.util.PemReaderTest.testLoadEncryptedPrivateKeyFromKeyStoreWithWrongPassword(PemReaderTest.java:93) >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> ================================ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Crypto policy* >>>>>>>>> If I uncomment this configuration option: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> # Please see the JCA documentation for additional information on >>>> these >>>>>>>>> # files and formats. >>>>>>>>> # crypto.policy=unlimited >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> in: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/security/java.security >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> then it all works and I get no error at all. This option controls >>>>>> cryptographic strengths according to the documentation, and is present >>>>>> because of crypto regulations in different countries. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 27 Apr 2019, at 15:52, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Il sab 27 apr 2019, 14:18 Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> ha >>>>>> scritto: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have a clarification question about the RC. To build the RC, I >>>>>> had to >>>>>>>>>>> enable crypto.policy unlimited in the jre (I'm using build >>>>>> 1.8.0_152-b16). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Flavio >>>>>>>>>> What do you mean with 'build' ? >>>>>>>>>> Make tests pass? >>>>>>>>>> AFAIK we are not using tweaked jdks in CI builds, so in theory >>> there >>>>>> is no >>>>>>>>>> need. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can you please share your error? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Enrico >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm wondering if this is going to be an issue for some users as >>> this >>>>>> option >>>>>>>>>>> is related to import/export regulation. Has anyone looked into it >>>>>> and could >>>>>>>>>>> clarify it to me, please? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 Apr 2019, at 15:10, Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This is the first stable release of 3.5 branch: 3.5.5. It >>> resolves >>>>>> 117 >>>>>>>>>>> issues, including Maven migration, Quorum TLS, TTL nodes and lots >>>>>> of other >>>>>>>>>>> performance and stability improvements. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The full release notes is available at: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12343268 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *** Please download, test and vote by May 3rd 2019, 23:59 UTC+0. >>>>>> *** >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Source files: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.5.5-rc5/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maven staging repos: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/parent/3.5.5/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper-jute/3.5.5/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/3.5.5/ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: >>>>>> release-3.5.5-rc5 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the >>>>>> release: >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Should we release this candidate? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >