On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 06:09:15PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > Hey Matthew (and rest of council), > > On Thu, May 22, 2025, at 5:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > The Fedora Council overturns FESCo's decision [3284] to remove Proven > > Packager rights from a contributor. > > The linked issue is private, are there plans to make it public in some > form or shape so we can see how the process went at the time?
No, I don't think we'll make the issue public. Among other reasons, there is a lot of discussion about personal matters. Making it publicly visible would go against the goal of avoiding making this public. > > The contributor didn't receive a formal notification or warning > > from FESCo. > > In the initial announcements about this FESco said that the proven packager > in question was warned multiple times and had numerous private complaints > against them. Specifically: > > >> Despite several warnings and conversations with FESCo representatives, X > >> has continued to use his provenpackager privileges in an unapproved manner > > How should we reconcile this? Were there warnings but they weren't > "official", or > were there no warnings and the FESco announcement was incorrect? The word "formal" is very important here. We never wrote a message signed by "FESCo", with a specific terms and warnings, etc. There were two instances of FESCo internally deciding to have one of the members reach out and have an in-person talk, but those talks could be considered informal. Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
