Reading through the feedback, wouldn't it be better to take a second look on the previous change:

Dne 24. 06. 25 v 12:02 Aoife Moloney via devel-announce napsal(a):
Since Fedora 37, leaf packages (i.e. packages that are not depended on
by other packages) can simply
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EncourageI686LeafRemoval stop
building for i686] without any reason, which has allowed package
maintainers to focus their work on architectures where packages are
actually shipped to users.


While it encourages removal of i686, I think that nobody was ever really serious about this.

For example, I maintain Ruby and I have not disabled i686 build, because there are other packages depending on Ruby. I don't think that they are used, but I am not going to do the review.

Alternatively, I could have disable the i686 build of Ruby, but I'm not sure who would fix the FTBFS packages.

Granted, there is no tooling which would make this easy. This proposal kind of workarounds this ...



Vít


Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to