On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:40:51 +0200
Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 22:07:40 -0600
> Orion Poplawski <or...@nwra.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 7/30/25 00:40, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > > 
> > > On 28.07.25 11:12, Dan Horák wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 10:40:03 +0200
> > >> Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> So there was a 64-bit instruction bundle at the patched offset, and that
> > >> may have been the reason why ucx failed to patch properly.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks - is this already being tracked somewhere?
> > > 
> > > Sandro
> > > 
> > 
> > It seems to be affecting a number of packages, netcdf as well.
> > 
> > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/netcdf
> > 
> > do we know what is responsible so we can file an issue?
> 
> the root cause is ucx, which is affecting other packages via openmpi

I am preparing an upstream ucx ticket right now ...


                Dan
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to