On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Darren Swan <thegundamg...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I'm honestly tired of hearing about this. Felipe, you come across as > immature and not willing to listen. I'm not going to take sides on whether > or not msn-pecan should be included in Adium 1.X. I will however point out > that this entire thread has been a huge waste of time. There are so many > other things involved with BOTH sides of the argument that need to be sorted > out before either side can consider working together. I'm not going to point > out specific points, I'm solely going to request that this topic come to a > close. The users of Adium are suffering in this as it is a waste of time and > detracting attention from bugs that could be fixed. > In my opinion, if you're going to support MSN within a third-party > messenger, and I'm not being specific to any one messenger, you need to > implement and support as many features of MSN as you possibly can. File > Transfers, ability to talk to certain contacts, send animated smiley faces, > it doesn't matter how small the feature, someone somewhere will be looking > for it when they switch from using the first party program.
Ad hominem attacks. Awesome. Your mail was a waste of time. I believe this thread is closed as we've reached consensus: we will consider this for 1.5, at which point the move to msn-pecan will be evaluated based on the status of msn-pecan and the importance of the YIM feature. And regarding your idealistic comment; yeah ideally every feature should be implemented, but since we have limited resource we need to prioritize. You can see the prioritized tickets here: http://code.google.com/p/msn-pecan/issues/list You can cast your vote there. But as you can see it's pretty obvious that the next items to work on are: an easier way to set personal messages (in Pidgin), and support to login to multiple locations. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras
