Could you pleas unsubscribe me from adium email list? On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:06 AM, Shawn Khan <shawn.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Colin, > > I just have to say upfront, I am a low level developer on the Adium Code so > if I jump on any toes, please let me know. > > I believe that when we discussed the time based releases this was great but > we were unsure if we could make this happen. The problem is that we get > developers who are super busy at one time (can't work on adium) and not busy > at others (can work on adium). For myself, seeing time based releases might > speed up getting tickets figured out, but on the other hand we might never > meet them. > > If we work on a document like the above one that would be amazing to do, > and watching that document would be good to see where Mozilla takes their > release cycle. > > If I am not right, Robby did come up with a time base release cycle, and I > really liked that idea. > > From what I understand of 1.5 has been around along time. The only thing > that I would like to know is how far we are at 64 bit? If we are far in > that, would we need to wait for other tickets to be fixed? My thoughts are > that we get the regression and major tickets figured out. This will really > speed up the process of getting 1.5 out, and we can set a date after 1.4 is > out. > > If we are talking about the 1.6 branch merging with the 1.5 branch I am > okay with this. If there is a 10.6 branch, then I would say I am clueless > about this. As for outrage, I know from my end there would be none for me. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Colin Barrett < > co...@springsandstruts.com> wrote: > >> Well did have that huge discussion about doing something like this a while >> back, and supposedly implemented a similar time based plan (that we didn't >> stick to). >> >> So I figured this could be "relevant to our interests" as they say... >> >> -Colin >> >> On Mar 20, 2011, at 7:20 PM, Christopher Forsythe wrote: >> >> > Is this something you're proposing adium do? How do you think it should >> look for Adium? >> > >> > Chris >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Colin Barrett < >> co...@springsandstruts.com> wrote: >> > This is just a draft, and not finalized yet, but it's worth a look >> http://people.mozilla.com/~sayrer/2011/temp/process.html Obviously a 6 >> week cadence isn't something we can support, but it's worth watching how >> this transition ends up playing out, I think. >> > >> > What is our current status with respect to releasing 1.5? Have we >> reached consensus on the 10.6 issue? If someone merged in the 10.6 branch on >> Monday afternoon, how outraged would the thread be? ;) >> > >> > -Colin >> > >> >> >> > -- Best regards, Alon Barzilay, CEO Co-Founder Come2Play Mobile: +972-52-5296668 Tel: +972-3-7306541
