Great news, thanks a lot Evan!

Thijs

On 21 mei 2012, at 22:29, Evan D. Schoenberg, M.D. wrote:

> I took the much less technically satisfying but simpler route and talked to 
> Damien at Network Redux today. :)  I suggested that he mail the Mac Mini to 
> me and I'd take care of the upgrade; he counter suggested that he could have 
> one of the engineers perform the upgrade for us. Sold.
> 
> -Evan
> On Friday, May 18, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Evan Kinney wrote:
> 
>> Okay, so this *would* have worked fine, except for that little bit I forgot 
>> where there's no way to get EFI to use a static IP for TFTP without hacking 
>> your way into the EFI shell with rEFIt or something.
>> 
>> Then I was just going to resize the root partition so I could stick the 
>> image there and reboot… but then I remembered that you couldn't 
>> non-destructively resize HFS+ until 10.6.
>> 
>> So, yeah. Here we are. Any other ideas? I'm nowhere near Portland. :)
>> 
>> I did have another idea, though. VMware's free version of ESXi supports OS X 
>> as a guest as of v5. I have it running in production at work on some Xserves 
>> to host build nodes. I've never tried running it on a Mini, though. All the 
>> drivers seem to be there to support everything. I have a 2,1 model laying 
>> around somewhere, I'm sure; I'll see what I can make happen. Considering the 
>> lack of console access to the hardware, I'd think this would be a pretty 
>> good solution for platforms that are just kept around for regression testing 
>> and whatnot.
>> 
>> On the other hand, Raritan makes a 0U dongle-ish 1 port IP KVM for around 
>> $400. I'd offer to donate one of the Avocent DSR2035s I have laying around, 
>> but they're 1U and have 48 ports, heh.
>> 
>> /ek
>> 
>> On May 17, 2012, at 8:39 AM, Evan Schoenberg wrote:
>> 
>>> Evan,
>>> 
>>> I approve of your naming!
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your awesome debugging work with the 1.5b1 10.6 dependency 
>>> issues.
>>> 
>>> If you'll please email me your public key I'll get you added for access to 
>>> Smew. Muscovy's not running server, though if that would be helpful for 
>>> this and other purposes we can certainly upgrade it, no problem.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Evan
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 17, 2012, at 7:08 AM, Evan Kinney <evan.kin...@sas.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I have a NetBoot image I created a while ago that will do an in-place 
>>>> upgrade of 10.5 to 10.6.8 through a bit of hackery and magic with 
>>>> OSUpgrade.pkg.
>>>> 
>>>> Is Muscovy running Server? It's fine if it's not; I have a NetBoot setup I 
>>>> can use at my house if need be. "bless" has a handy --netboot option that 
>>>> lets you point to any ABDP server and not rely on multicast discovery. 
>>>> That + --nextonly == unattended upgrade.
>>>> 
>>>> Also, I don't think I ever properly introduced myself: hi, I'm Evan.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On May 16, 2012, at 4:17 PM, "Evan Schoenberg" <e...@adium.im> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Agreed. I would however like to have access to a share 10.6 testing 
>>>>> device; smew is useless to us on 10.5.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Evan
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On May 16, 2012, at 12:34 PM, Colin Barrett <co...@springsandstruts.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not up to date on what y'all have tried but switching to 10.6 seems like 
>>>>>> an absolute last resort. I mean, 10.8 will come out one day, and Xcode 3 
>>>>>> isn't going to be viable to build 10.7/10.8 apps. Gotta figure this 
>>>>>> stuff out at some point, eh?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Colin (via thumbs)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On May 16, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Thijs Alkemade <thijsalkem...@gmail.com> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The dependencies for Adium 1.5.1b1 were pretty screwed up. IRC was
>>>>>>> broken because of what I can only pin down to not doing a clean build,
>>>>>>> libintl apparently has a problem with building for 10.6 on 10.7 with
>>>>>>> Xcode 4.3 [1].
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> In short, it is pretty much required to do a full clean build every
>>>>>>> time and it seems every new release of Xcode breaks something else. I
>>>>>>> think it would be a lot safer to go back to Xcode 3 on 10.6.8 (as long
>>>>>>> as 10.6.8 is our target), so we always have the same compiler and
>>>>>>> SDKs. I have an old Macbook which is still on 10.6.8, but it's in
>>>>>>> pretty bad shape. So I'd much rather have one of the build machines
>>>>>>> build the dependencies, but that would need a machine with 10.6.8 (and
>>>>>>> we now only have Smew on 10.5.8 and Muscovy on 10.7.4). Maybe this
>>>>>>> will also make it easy to distribute the dSYMs.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Adrian says Smew can't be upgraded remotely. Is there another way?
>>>>>>> Could someone visit the datacenter? Can we ask NetworkRedux?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Thijs
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [1] http://trac.adium.im/ticket/15996#comment:16
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 6:30 PM, Adrian Godoroja <robot...@me.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Unfortunately i didn't find any way of install Snow Leopard remotely.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> - Adrian.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 06, 2012, at 17:26, Adrian Godoroja wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> does anybody has around a licensed Snow Leopard disc?
>>>>>>>> I'd appreciate if somebody could copy a SL dmg to the Muscovy, so i 
>>>>>>>> can try
>>>>>>>> and install it on Smew.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Adrian.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 06, 2012, at 14:57, Evan D. Schoenberg, M.D. wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Go for it on both counts! Upgrade was completed successfully.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>> Evan
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Friday, April 6, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Adrian Godoroja wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi Evan,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> thats great news. Will you also update Xcode, etc. or can i take care 
>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>> rest of the stuff?
>>>>>>>> Also, are there any plans to update Smew to 10.6?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Adrian.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 06, 2012, at 00:49, Evan D. Schoenberg, M.D. wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'm running an unattended installation to update muscovy to 10.7. The
>>>>>>>> machine will be down for an hour or so while that does its thing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -Evan
> 


Reply via email to