I give my thought.
Paolo may add more.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kinney, Michael D
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 11:25 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>; Paolo Bonzini
> <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>;
> r...@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> qemu devel list <qemu-de...@nongnu.org>; Igor Mammedov
> <imamm...@redhat.com>; Chen, Yingwen <yingwen.c...@intel.com>;
> Nakajima, Jun <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>; Boris Ostrovsky
> <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>; Joao Marcal Lemos Martins
> <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>; Phillip Goerl <phillip.go...@oracle.com>
> Subject: RE: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] CPU hotplug using SMM with
> QEMU+OVMF
>
> Hi Jiewen,
>
> If a hot add CPU needs to run any code before the
> first SMI, I would recommend is only executes code
> from a write protected FLASH range without a stack
> and then wait for the first SMI.
[Jiewen] Right.
Another option from Paolo, the new CPU will not run until 0x7b.
To mitigate DMA threat, someone need guarantee the low memory SIPI vector is
DMA protected.
NOTE: The LOW memory *could* be mapped to write protected FLASH AREA via PAM
register. The Host CPU may setup that in SMM.
If that is the case, we don’t need worry DMA.
I copied the detail step here, because I found it is hard to dig them out again.
====================
(01a) QEMU: create new CPU. The CPU already exists, but it does not
start running code until unparked by the CPU hotplug controller.
(01b) QEMU: trigger SCI
(02-03) no equivalent
(04) Host CPU: (OS) execute GPE handler from DSDT
(05) Host CPU: (OS) Port 0xB2 write, all CPUs enter SMM (NOTE: New CPU
will not enter CPU because SMI is disabled)
(06) Host CPU: (SMM) Save 38000, Update 38000 -- fill simple SMM
rebase code.
(07a) Host CPU: (SMM) Write to CPU hotplug controller to enable
new CPU
(07b) Host CPU: (SMM) Send INIT/SIPI/SIPI to new CPU.
(08a) New CPU: (Low RAM) Enter protected mode.
(08b) New CPU: (Flash) Signals host CPU to proceed and enter cli;hlt loop.
(09) Host CPU: (SMM) Send SMI to the new CPU only.
(10) New CPU: (SMM) Run SMM code at 38000, and rebase SMBASE to
TSEG.
(11) Host CPU: (SMM) Restore 38000.
(12) Host CPU: (SMM) Update located data structure to add the new CPU
information. (This step will involve CPU_SERVICE protocol)
(13) New CPU: (Flash) do whatever other initialization is needed
(14) New CPU: (Flash) Deadloop, and wait for INIT-SIPI-SIPI.
(15) Host CPU: (OS) Send INIT-SIPI-SIPI to pull new CPU in..
====================
>
> For this OVMF use case, is any CPU init required
> before the first SMI?
[Jiewen] I am sure what is the detail action in 08b.
And I am not sure what your "init" means here?
Personally, I don’t think we need too much init work, such as Microcode or MTRR.
But we need detail info.
> From Paolo's list of steps are steps (8a) and (8b)
> really required? Can the SMI monarch use the Local
> APIC to send a directed SMI to the hot added CPU?
> The SMI monarch needs to know the APIC ID of the
> hot added CPU.
[Jiewen] I think it depend upon virtual hardware design.
Leave question to Paolo.
Do we also need to handle the case
> where multiple CPUs are added at once? I think we
> would need to serialize the use of 3000:8000 for the
> SMM rebase operation on each hot added CPU.
> It would be simpler if we can guarantee that only
> one CPU can be added or removed at a time and the
> complete flow of adding a CPU to SMM and the OS
> needs to be completed before another add/remove
> event needs to be processed.
[Jiewen] Right.
I treat the multiple CPU hot-add at same time as a potential threat.
We don’t want to trust end user.
The solution could be:
1) Let trusted hardware guarantee hot-add one by one.
2) Let trusted software (SMM and init code) guarantee SMREBASE one by one
(include any code runs before SMREBASE)
3) Let trusted software (SMM and init code) support SMREBASE simultaneously
(include any code runs before SMREBASE).
Solution #1 or #2 are simple solution.
> Mike
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yao, Jiewen
> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 10:00 PM
> > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>;
> > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> > <ler...@redhat.com>; r...@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>;
> > devel@edk2.groups.io; qemu devel list <qemu-
> > de...@nongnu.org>; Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>;
> > Chen, Yingwen <yingwen.c...@intel.com>; Nakajima, Jun
> > <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>; Boris Ostrovsky
> > <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>; Joao Marcal Lemos Martins
> > <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>; Phillip Goerl
> > <phillip.go...@oracle.com>
> > Subject: RE: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] CPU hotplug using
> > SMM with QEMU+OVMF
> >
> > Thank you Mike!
> >
> > That is good reference on the real hardware behavior.
> > (Glad it is public.)
> >
> > For threat model, the unique part in virtual environment
> > is temp RAM.
> > The temp RAM in real platform is per CPU cache, while
> > the temp RAM in virtual platform is global memory.
> > That brings one more potential attack surface in virtual
> > environment, if hot-added CPU need run code with stack
> > or heap before SMI rebase.
> >
> > Other threats, such as SMRAM or DMA, are same.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Yao Jiewen
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 9:03 AM
> > > To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> > > <ler...@redhat.com>; r...@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen
> > > <jiewen....@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>;
> > > devel@edk2.groups.io; qemu devel list <qemu-
> > de...@nongnu.org>; Igor
> > > Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>; Chen, Yingwen
> > > <yingwen.c...@intel.com>; Nakajima, Jun
> > <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>;
> > > Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>; Joao
> > Marcal Lemos
> > > Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>; Phillip Goerl
> > > <phillip.go...@oracle.com>
> > > Subject: RE: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] CPU hotplug using
> > SMM with
> > > QEMU+OVMF
> > >
> > > Paolo,
> > >
> > > I find the following links related to the discussions
> > here along with
> > > one example feature called GENPROTRANGE.
> > >
> > > https://csrc.nist.gov/CSRC/media/Presentations/The-
> > Whole-is-Greater/im
> > > a ges-media/day1_trusted-computing_200-250.pdf
> > > https://cansecwest.com/slides/2017/CSW2017_Cuauhtemoc-
> > Rene_CPU_Ho
> > > t-Add_flow.pdf
> > > https://www.mouser.com/ds/2/612/5520-5500-chipset-ioh-
> > datasheet-1131
> > > 292.pdf
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 4:12 PM
> > > > To: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>;
> > Laszlo Ersek
> > > > <ler...@redhat.com>; r...@edk2.groups.io; Yao, Jiewen
> > > > <jiewen....@intel.com>
> > > > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com>;
> > > > devel@edk2.groups.io; qemu devel list <qemu-
> > de...@nongnu.org>; Igor
> > > > Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>; Chen, Yingwen
> > > > <yingwen.c...@intel.com>; Nakajima, Jun
> > <jun.nakaj...@intel.com>;
> > > > Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>; Joao
> > Marcal Lemos
> > > > Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>; Phillip Goerl
> > > > <phillip.go...@oracle.com>
> > > > Subject: Re: [edk2-rfc] [edk2-devel] CPU hotplug
> > using SMM with
> > > > QEMU+OVMF
> > > >
> > > > On 23/08/19 00:32, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> > > > > Paolo,
> > > > >
> > > > > It is my understanding that real HW hot plug uses
> > the
> > > > SDM defined
> > > > > methods. Meaning the initial SMI is to 3000:8000
> > and
> > > > they rebase to
> > > > > TSEG in the first SMI. They must have chipset
> > specific
> > > > methods to
> > > > > protect 3000:8000 from DMA.
> > > >
> > > > It would be great if you could check.
> > > >
> > > > > Can we add a chipset feature to prevent DMA to
> > 64KB
> > > > range from
> > > > > 0x30000-0x3FFFF and the UEFI Memory Map and ACPI
> > > > content can be
> > > > > updated so the Guest OS knows to not use that
> > range for
> > > > DMA?
> > > >
> > > > If real hardware does it at the chipset level, we
> > will probably use
> > > > Igor's suggestion of aliasing A-seg to 3000:0000.
> > Before starting
> > > > the new CPU, the SMI handler can prepare the SMBASE
> > relocation
> > > > trampoline at
> > > > A000:8000 and the hot-plugged CPU will find it at
> > > > 3000:8000 when it receives the initial SMI. Because
> > this is backed
> > > > by RAM at 0xA0000-0xAFFFF, DMA cannot access it and
> > would still go
> > > > through to RAM at 0x30000.
> > > >
> > > > Paolo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#46343): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/46343
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/32979681/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
