On 09/09/19 20:03, Kubacki, Michael A wrote:
> I completely understand the need for granular breakup of changes for code 
> review and future maintenance. I would not send this as a single patch on the 
> mailing list for formal code review. Due to the size of the change, the main 
> point here was to initially focus feedback on the high-level approach and 
> design sparing the review of implementation details for an actual code 
> review. Though I understand for those interested, it is much easier to digest 
> the code in a clean patch series so I will send that RFC series to the list 
> once I incorporate the feedback already received.

Thank you!

> I replied elsewhere inline.

For those answers as well.


Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#47121): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47121
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/33158252/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]

Reply via email to