On 09/09/19 20:03, Kubacki, Michael A wrote: > I completely understand the need for granular breakup of changes for code > review and future maintenance. I would not send this as a single patch on the > mailing list for formal code review. Due to the size of the change, the main > point here was to initially focus feedback on the high-level approach and > design sparing the review of implementation details for an actual code > review. Though I understand for those interested, it is much easier to digest > the code in a clean patch series so I will send that RFC series to the list > once I incorporate the feedback already received.
Thank you! > I replied elsewhere inline. For those answers as well. Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#47121): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/47121 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/33158252/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
