-----Original Message-----
From: Laszlo Ersek<ler...@redhat.com>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2024 9:48 PM
To: Ni, Ray<ray...@intel.com>;devel@edk2.groups.io;lic...@loongson.cn;
Sunil V L<suni...@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Kinney, Michael D<michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann
<kra...@redhat.com>; Chang, Abner<abner.ch...@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
On 1/19/24 11:17, Ni, Ray wrote:
Chao,
In the plan A, CpuDxe.inf contains reference to
gUefiCpuPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdCpuExceptionVectorBaseAddress in [Pcd]
section. But I guess it’s only needed by LoongArch64. That’s why I
didn’t like the common-inf idea.
But after looking at the other INF changes, I changed my mind. I think
the common-inf looks good as the other INF files don’t have so much
difference between LoonArch and x86.
So, I am ok with plan A. Thanks for preparing both changes for review.
Mike, Laszlo, Gerd, Abner, any comments?
I'm also OK with plan A.
Thanks
Laszlo
Thanks,
Ray
*From:* Chao Li<lic...@loongson.cn>
*Sent:* Thursday, January 18, 2024 4:27 PM
*To:* Ni, Ray<ray...@intel.com>; Sunil V L<suni...@ventanamicro.com>
*Cc:*devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D
<michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek<ler...@redhat.com>; Gerd
Hoffmann<kra...@redhat.com>; Abner Chang<abner.ch...@amd.com>
*Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
Hi Ray and Sunil,
Sorry, I'm late, I have very busy these days.
I created two PRs in my private repo.
*Plan A:*
Moved most of LoongArch libraries and drivers to current matching
folders, removed LoongArch private INF, adjusted common INF.
URL:https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/8
<https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/8>
*Plan B:*
Moved most of LoongArch libraries and drivers to current matching
folders, keeping to use LoongArch private INF.
URL:https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/9
<https://github.com/kilaterlee/edk2/pull/9>
After you reading these two PRs, let's discuss how to deal with INF.
I prefer plan A, it is better to use the same INF for all ARCHs and have
only one INF per modules. I was discussed this plan with Ray and Abner,
but it was not allowed at the time.
Thanks,
Chao
On 2024/1/16 08:59, Chao Li wrote:
OK, let me finish this work tomorrow, I'm a little busy today.
On 2024/1/15 16:11, Ni, Ray wrote:
Yes. Fine to me. Thanks!
Thanks,
Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: Sunil V L<suni...@ventanamicro.com>
<mailto:suni...@ventanamicro.com>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 2:46 PM
To: Chao Li<lic...@loongson.cn> <mailto:lic...@loongson.cn>
Cc:devel@edk2.groups.io <mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Ni, Ray
<ray...@intel.com> <mailto:ray...@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
<michael.d.kin...@intel.com> <mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>;
Laszlo Ersek<ler...@redhat.com> <mailto:ler...@redhat.com>; Gerd
Hoffmann<kra...@redhat.com> <mailto:kra...@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 02:17:09PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
Ray and Sunil,
I plan send two example PRs to github to show how to deal the
INFs, one to
adjust current INF, and another PR to move the libraris to the
current
folders. I hope after these two PRs are sent we can decide
what to do
with
the INF. What do you think of this plan?
Hi Chao, That's fine with me.
Thanks,
Sunil
Thanks,
Chao
On 2024/1/15 13:44, Ni, Ray wrote:
That will be great!
Thanks,
Ray
-----Original Message-----
From: Sunil V L<suni...@ventanamicro.com>
<mailto:suni...@ventanamicro.com>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 12:44 PM
To: Ni, Ray<ray...@intel.com>
<mailto:ray...@intel.com>
Cc:devel@edk2.groups.io;lic...@loongson.cn
<mailto:Cc:devel@edk2.groups.io;lic...@loongson.cn>; Kinney, Michael D
<michael.d.kin...@intel.com>
<mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek<ler...@redhat.com>
<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>; Gerd
Hoffmann<kra...@redhat.com> <mailto:kra...@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: Folder layout change in UefiCpuPkg
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 01:13:03AM +0000, Ni, Ray
wrote:
Sunil,
I am glad that you don't have concern about the
direction.
"RiscV" is good to me.
Thanks!, Ray. So, shall I send patches to reorganize
this?
Thanks,
Sunil
