As I documented in the comment: This patch provides the SmmRelocationLib library instance for OVMF to handle the logic difference, and it won't change the existing implementation code logic.
But as I said, it depends on you. I will drop the OvmfPkg/SmmRelocationLib since confirmed we can use the ADM version for OVMF. Thanks, Jiaxin > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> > Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 4:43 PM > To: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin...@intel.com> > Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star > <star.z...@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.ku...@intel.com>; Dong, > Guo <guo.d...@intel.com>; Rhodes, Sean <sean@starlabs.systems>; Lu, > James <james...@intel.com>; Guo, Gua <gua....@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel > <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>; Abdul > Lateef Attar <abdullateef.at...@amd.com>; Abner Chang > <abner.ch...@amd.com>; Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v3 00/13] Add SmmRelocationLib > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 07:31:18AM +0000, Wu, Jiaxin wrote: > > Thanks Gerd, I will try the S3 on OVMF. > > > > And for AmdSmmRelocationLib usage in OVMF, do you prefer: > > 1. use the AmdSmmRelocationLib directly in this patch set? Or > > 2. still keep the original to create the OvmfPkg/SmmRelocationLib, and clean > the code in the future patch? > > Clear preference for (1), why introduce OvmfPkg/SmmRelocationLib only to > delete it shortly thereafter? > > take care, > Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#118137): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118137 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105593568/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
