> I'm wondering how stable the emi2 implementation in CVS is. Some > preliminary tests show that it seems to work quite allright, but I've > experienced one problem so far. Doing batch sends give following > bearerbox log lines: > > WARNING: smsc_emi2: received neither ACK nor NACK for message 1 in 60 > seconds, resending message > > And the messages are delayed apparently for n * 60 seconds, where n is > the message number. The Emi2 implementation has a feauture I badly need > (alphanumeric sender), so I'd like get it working. Any pointers?
AFAIK, emi2 is used in production environments in a couple of sites, including our own. So you should consider CVS to be a good choice. Maybe your SMSC is unable to batch the SMSs you try to send in that speed? Andreas, is this related to the "I have to wait for an ACK before I try to send the next" issue you had/have? Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
