> > I'm wondering how stable the emi2 implementation in CVS is. Some >> preliminary tests show that it seems to work quite allright, but I've >> experienced one problem so far. Doing batch sends give following >> bearerbox log lines: >> >> WARNING: smsc_emi2: received neither ACK nor NACK for message 1 in 60 >> seconds, resending message >> >> And the messages are delayed apparently for n * 60 seconds, where n is >> the message number. The Emi2 implementation has a feauture I badly need >> (alphanumeric sender), so I'd like get it working. Any pointers? > >AFAIK, emi2 is used in production environments in a couple of sites, >including our own. So you should consider CVS to be a good choice. > >Maybe your SMSC is unable to batch the SMSs you try to send in that >speed? > >Andreas, is this related to the "I have to wait for an ACK before I >try to send the next" issue you had/have?
Definitively. setting window size and/or throughput fixes that. -- Andreas Fink Fink-Consulting ------------------------------------------------------------------ Tel: +41-61-6932730 Fax: +41-61-6932729 Mobile: +41-79-2457333 Address: A. Fink, Schwarzwaldallee 16, 4058 Basel, Switzerland E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.finkconsulting.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ Something urgent? Try http://www.smsrelay.com/ Nickname afink
