do you get the panic even if you don't specify the dlr_* in http push ?
5.3.1 Submit Short Message operation (positive result) The following list shows the parameters in the positive result data field: Parameter Type Presence Description ACK Char "A" M Positive acknowledgement MVP String of char O Modified validity period SM String of char. O System message MVP is optional. DLR code should be aware of that and documentation should mention that too in dlr documentation. -- Bruno David Rodrigues ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andreas Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:03 AM Subject: Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR? > > I've never seen a crash in smsbox because of this. SMSbox is > > unchanged as far as DLR's are concerned. If you got an assert, in > > your case, thats normal because your EMI reply is not what bearerbox > > would expect. Of course this should be fixed and is relatively easy > > to fix. But it also means that in your case DLR's will not work > > because no timestamp imformation is given back from the SMSC. > > Could you provide the fix for emi2 here? We would like to have again a > working CVS tree for development. > > BTW, please instruct me on how I can help you in figuring out if the > timestamp's are supported using our SMSC and I'll provide for > information on this. >
