----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Francesco Emmi"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Enzo dell'Aquila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Kannel-devel (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:17 PM
Subject: RE: Bug in smsc_emi2.c?
> Dear Bruno:
>
> I don't think the '39' is relevant at all. What is relevant
> is that when the correct setting for PID is '0', it is
> omitted from the UCP and from sending. This shouldn't happen.
>
> The '39' is just garbage from somewhere else.
>
> I would like to know the logic behind this line:
> ] > smsc_emi2.c::
> ] > 373c371
> ] > < if(msg->sms.pid != 0) {
>
> Why omit PID if it is zero? Isn't it a valid value?
Yes it is, and it is the default, therefor it is not needed!
