HI Alex, --On Thursday, September 12, 2002 5:02 PM +0100 Alex Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. The main priority should be to be complete the functionality > needed to be able to send and recieve messages to and from a variety of > different 1st phase released MMS-Cs as per the current live v1 WAP MMS > protocol implementation. Since there were also some question like 'I don't know it all??' maybe it is wise to create a web page that provides links to specific (useful) documents. > > From this point of view adding complete support for SAR is one of the > current blocks and we have a good start in this area with the recent > submissions. Testing is obviously needed here and access to the amount of > software/hardware you have would be great. > > Potentially I would also suggest a seperate cvs branch which can be > developed on without breaking the rest of the functionality. As most of us > here use the cvs version of Kannel as staging (or often as live), I'd like > to make sure that the changes don't stop the bug fixes. I agree here. It was the way forward I see too. The branch also allows the group to experiment more. > > Stipe - any thoughts? Some time ago he mentioned he would be on vacation. That could be now, since he mostly reacts quickly. Harrie Internet Management Consulting mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http ://www.mod-snmp.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- Author of MOD-SNMP, enabling SNMP management to the Apache server.
