-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stipe, all,
On Monday 13 January 2003 22:54, Stipe Tolj wrote: > should we introduce transmitter and receiver dependent status flags, > like > > smpp->conn->status->receiver = SMSCCON_RECONNECTING; > smpp->conn->status->transmitter = SMSCCON_ACTIVE. > > ?? it looks ugly (IMHO). What about , just to allow either receiver or transmitter or transceiver ? Like so: group = smsc smsc = smpp port = xxx host = xxx group = smsc smsc = smpp receive-port = xxx receive-host = xxx ?? > > Any patch for the suspected rade condition yet? > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 D�sseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are - -- Best Regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus K�ln Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________ Centrium GmbH Ehrenstrasse 2 50672 K�ln Fon: +49 (0221) 277 49 150 Fax: +49 (0221) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.centrium.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+I0V9nX3e5W+uJ0ERAgFeAJoCSwIZr94FhPjF6KgapRzSymasAQCglkh9 DuMmB9lMAEpnrZfNMspHa2k= =6Yil -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
