Alexander Malysh wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Stipe, all, > > On Monday 13 January 2003 22:54, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > should we introduce transmitter and receiver dependent status flags, > > like > > > > smpp->conn->status->receiver = SMSCCON_RECONNECTING; > > smpp->conn->status->transmitter = SMSCCON_ACTIVE. > > > > ?? > > it looks ugly (IMHO). What about , just to allow either receiver or > transmitter or transceiver ? Like so: > group = smsc > smsc = smpp > port = xxx > host = xxx > > group = smsc > smsc = smpp > receive-port = xxx > receive-host = xxx > > ??
wuuuooo. that means you can't use the same smsc-id for sending and receiving. :( Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG M�nsterstr. 248 40470 D�sseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
