Stipe, some of them are "a bit" old, but their status is still "new". does it mean that all of them are still active or maybe some of them were fixed with the help of mailing list? so perhaps when fixing a bug, attention should also be paid if the bug wasn't fixed?
regards, Dziugas Baltrunas On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Hi list, > > I see that there are people reporting bugs to http://bugs.kannel.org/. > But there are a "few" (which is a polite description) people who > really chase after things and fix issues. > > Even while things are not fixable or the bug reports are nonsence, all > developers should yield their Kannel time to also check frequently the > current bug tracking status and grap certain issues to resolve them. > > I'd like to see some bugs moving away before 1.3.2 devel is released > ;) > I'll do some of them, but I guess help is very *welcome*! > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 D�sseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are >
