The strangest thing is that if I look in the phone memory, there are no messages found. So they are routed to Kannel as expected. But still the phone shows a dialog with "no new space for new messages" where I have to select Ok to get rid of it. But the SMS-c is not delivering messages anymore from that time on. Delivery reports are set to no. What is the correct setting for CNMI? I use CNMI=2,2,0,0,0 and I have tried CNMI=1,2,0,0,0.
It looks like the phone thinks it holds the messages, but they are not. I am really puzzled. The problem is I have Orange as a customer but they only are supporting the GSM 1800 frequency and the Wavecoms I normally use WMD02 only support 900. (AT+CGMM response is 900P) Hope someone knows a solutions to this. Kind regards, Edwin Poot -----Original Message----- From: Oded Arbel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: dinsdag 24 juni 2003 19:23 To: Edwin R. Poot; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AT2 with Nokia 6210 memory problem Are messages being stored in the SIM memory at all ? how about delivery reports ? if not - what fills up the memory of the phone ? -- Oded Arbel m-Wise mobile solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-9-9581711 (116) +972-67-340014 ::.. Cinemuck, n.: The combination of popcorn, soda, and melted chocolate which covers the floors of movie theaters. -- "Sniglets" / Rich Hall > -----Original Message----- > From: Edwin R. Poot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 4:12 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AT2 with Nokia 6210 memory problem > > > Hello, > > I run into problemns with one of my modems, the Nokia 6210 phone. This > phone is connected to Kannel and although I have configured kannel > with using the phone memory instead of SIM memory () I keep > getting a dialog > on the phone, saying memory is full. As a result, the operator SMS-c > does not deliver any more incoming SMS-es. The only thing > that helps is > turning the phone off and on and restarting kannel. Only then messages > are delivered again from the SMS-c to the phone. > > Does anyone know a solution for this, I never ran into such problems > with my Wavecom modems. > > Thanks in advance for the help, > > > Edwin Poot > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Himalay Gopu > Sent: dinsdag 24 juni 2003 14:40 > To: Stipe Tolj > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Kannel Routing and Performance Issues ! > > > I have used forced-smsc in sendsms-user and set denied-sms-id in smsc > group --- is this not enough is it mandatory to set allowed-smsc-id > > One more query > > I have 4 smsc links with same smscid and if one drops dead then if had > restart the smsc what would happen --- will kannel restart all the > smsc links with that smscid > > Himalay > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > Stipe Tolj > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 5:38 PM > To: Himalay Gopu > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Kannel Routing and Performance Issues ! > > > Himalay Gopu wrote: > > > > list > > > > I have been using kannel for almost 2 months now but i have been > > facing few problems > > > > Iam using kannel stable version on SuSe 8.1 > > > > Approach > > I am connected to 4 smsc ( 2 smpp and 2 UCP ) > > > > Two of smsc connections are through VPN > > > > Kannel is binding to 6 servers for receiving SMS and one to > send SMS > > for one SMPP SMSC --- I have 7 smsc connections with same smsc-id > > ----Is this rite approach > > > > Anything going wrong in my approach > > Issues > > > > 1) I have seen that most of my messages are routed through a > > particular smsc even after i set the CGI variable smsc > > have you 'allowed-smsc-id' directives in the smsc groups?! > > If no, then Kannel will simply pick the first one that is considered > online. > > > 2) I have not crossed 30 sms for min throughput ( does VPN > got to do > > anything with throughput of Kannel ) > > I don't think so. I guess your internet connection itself is not the > limiting factor. I guess it's more to the SMSC provider itself. > > The fastes we got was 55 msg/sec. to O2 (Germany). All others are > performing less. So it's not a limitation of Kannel. Kannel can deal > with a *lot* more. > > > How can make Kannel more robust ----can anyone tickle their > brains and > > > throw some tips > > First of all, if you use 1.2.1 stable, you may consider upgrading to > current cvs tree, which is almost 1.3.2-pre (hence 1.3.2 will be > released shortly). > > We have cvs tree running on our production servers with 307 links in 3 > instances, performing very reliable. > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 D�sseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are > > >
