Yes, but what about those persistent ids!? I'm hoping to learn some C over winter (!), so if I have time I'll add pgsql support to postgres.
Cheers, Rory On 28/10/03, Alexander Malysh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > heh, one thing I can say: If you have need in such interface then just > implement it and send us patch :) > > On Tuesday 28 October 2003 17:06, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: [...General hoo-hah about moving interface from http to sql...] > > One issue that this does bring up, though, is that having native db > > support (I'd recommend Postgresql here, again, due to its excellent > > reliablity and BSD-style license) seems vital for persistant and unique > > message ids across all SMSC groups. -- Rory Campbell-Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <www.campbell-lange.net>
