On Tuesday 28 October 2003 17:42, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > Yes, but what about those persistent ids!?
see thread about unique id's for kannel... > > I'm hoping to learn some C over winter (!), so if I have time I'll add > pgsql support to postgres. Pgsql support _to_ postgres ??? it's already done by postresql people... If you mean, postgresql support for kannel then it's pretty simple :) and I will look in it over weekend... > > Cheers, > Rory > > On 28/10/03, Alexander Malysh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > heh, one thing I can say: If you have need in such interface then just > > implement it and send us patch :) > > > > On Tuesday 28 October 2003 17:06, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote: > > [...General hoo-hah about moving interface from http to sql...] > > > > One issue that this does bring up, though, is that having native db > > > support (I'd recommend Postgresql here, again, due to its excellent > > > reliablity and BSD-style license) seems vital for persistant and unique > > > message ids across all SMSC groups. -- Best regards / Mit besten Gr��en aus D�sseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________________ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.centrium.de msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 98063111 ___________________________________________ Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
