Indeed, kannel 1.3.1 outputs a warning every time it sees param 069. My advise: switch as soon as you can to CVS-version, as it is far more stable than 1.3.1
And if you tell me the details of the values you'd have to pass to your operator into params 064 and 065, maybe I can see if I can fit your needs into our working patch. Angel Fradejas Mediafusi�n Espa�a, S.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.mediafusion.es Tel +34 91 252 32 00 Fax +34 91 252 59 69 > -----Mensaje original----- > De: 'Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: martes 25 de noviembre de 2003 16:18 > Para: Angel Fradejas; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: Service description parameters in CIMD2 > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:25:35PM +0100, Angel Fradejas wrote: > > We're already working to add standard &binfo= capabilities > to the cimd2 > > driver. Maybe if you tell me what you we can take it into > consideration. For > > example, we don't need to use param 065 in any way with our > operators, but > > it seems you need it. > > > > Amen. If this happens soon it could make life a lot easier for me in > the near future. Our provider uses the tariff class and service > description parameters to do billing, and at the moment all > I've done is > statically add the values of these parameters to every > message sent via > kannel. Later on, I'll need to change these parameters depending on > what type of message is sent (operator logo, ringtones, etc)... > > > >> I've also noticed that parameter 69 (which the CIMD spec says is > > >> "Service Center Address") is not recognized by Kannel, and I keep > > >> getting warnings about it. I'll try to add this in the patch > > >> I'll make. > > > > Current cvs kannel does not give any warning for param 069 > (just ignores it > > silently), I made a patch for that months ago that went into cvs. > > What version are you using? > > 1.3.1 >
