Stipe, You're right. Relative URL in the page will lead to serious problem. Do you have any solutions?
Best Regards, Guanghua Hou ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Rene Kluwen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "ghhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 8:20 AM Subject: Re: HTTP redirect > Rene Kluwen wrote: > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > If you mean a relative URL in the Location: header. > > Then this is something against HTTP specs. One should not use them. > > Even though almost all browsers do prepend the original http-path if you do > > send them. > > nop, the point is different. > > Kannel wapbox does the Location following (hence redirection) > transparently to the WAP user agent. Hence relative URLs within the > WAP deck would result to address resources that are ment to be on a > previously redirected URL. And there is where we "may" run into > problems. > > Stipe > > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG >
