Hi Stipe There are a couple of issues. I am a _very_ happy user of Kannel's SMS capabilities and I would like to contribute more. Unfortunately I am not a C programmer.
When I provided some comments after doing some very amateurish hacking on the DLR (sdb) mechanisms the conversation quickly left my area of (limited) knowledge and centred on unique ids for all messages. Is this not perhaps a hint that the DLR component of the project should be more disassociated from the core functionality? Perhaps there needs to be tighter control of some core central part of the project, and that the rest of the project is divided into modules, with sub-teams maintaining them? This could mean that the core team can work on the 'kernel' and not be over-stretched. This comment is speculation -- I don't mean to offend anyone. I am very grateful for the Kannel project. My little company does not receive money directoy for the services it provides, but we wouldn't be doing protoype work for Orange unless we had it. Kind regards, Rory On 15/12/03, Stipe Tolj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > we expect that we have a huge ammount of people reading the list > because they use Kannel actively as SMS or/and WAP gateway for their > commercial purposes. > > Alexander and I had a couple of discussions today about how strong (or > consider the word weak better) the participation in the Kannel Group > is concerning bug fixing, feature enhancements and general development > activities.
