On Tuesday 16 December 2003 13:53, Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > Hi, Alexander. > > The problem is that I haven't write access to CVS ;).
oops, I thought you have write access... would you please add new option to userguide and resend a whole patch. I will commit it then. Thanks in advance... > > Alexander Malysh wrote: > > Hi Slava, > > > > as a known open-source-process , no votes/comments are equal to +0 , so > > you as a one that have write access should just commit things, because > > some time for review by others elapsed and no vetos are there. > > > > Only one comment from me: I'm +1 for this patch , but please add this new > > config option to userguide. We _must_ keep userguide uptodate. > > > > On Tuesday 16 December 2003 13:00, Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote: > >>Hi, List. > >>I agree with Angel about his feeling. > >>As example I can point to one provided patch: > >> > >>http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01697.html > >> > >>I posted it and didn't get any comments (negative or positive). > >>So I just use it in my enviroment. > >> > >>Angel Fradejas wrote: > >>>Hi all, > >>> > >>>First of all, I must say I love to contribute to the kannel project, and > >>>I tried hard months ago to be more active, both with > >>>comments/votes/advice and mainly with new code/ideas/features. > >>> > >>>We use kannel hard to process heavy premium-sms traffic (several > >>> millions MOs/month), so I guess we have dealed with the kind of issues > >>> you might expect doing this business: thousands of sms-services, > >>> sessions, centralized accounting, and so on. Not so much familiar with > >>> the heavy push-only business (although there we have the push-guru Alex > >>> :-) > >>> > >>>My main concern about our loss in activity in the devel list is the > >>>somewhat random criteria to accept or reject contributions: a developer > >>>is mainly motivated to contribute to an open source project if he/she > >>>sees his/her work is being taken into consideration, becames part of the > >>>tree, you know what. > >>> > >>>But here, to be frank, I have certain bad feelings that my contributions > >>>(not only code, but also ideas, suggestions, RFCs, etc.) have not been > >>>very sucessful (surely for very good reasons), but anyway you cannot > >>>abstract from that feelings. > >>> > >>>It comes to my minf for example discussing the need to make billing-info > >>>flow from smsbox to bearerbox (and there were several patches for that, > >>>not mine I have to say), and everybody replying that billing were > >>>something outside the scope of kannel, and so on, so we had the extra > >>>work of keeping that kind of patch in sync with cvs version, and then > >>> one day, voilá, &binfo= appears without any further explanation. That > >>> is the kind of randomness I'm referring to. > >>> > >>>Nobody takes offense from my comments, please. > >>> > >>>I'm just trying to explain my thoughts. > >>> > >>>Cheers. > >>> > >>>Angel Fradejas > >>>Mediafusión España, S.A. > >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>www.mediafusion.es -- Best regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Düsseldorf Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________________ Centrium GmbH Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf Fon: +49 (0211) 74 84 51 80 Fax: +49 (0211) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.centrium.de msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 98063111 ___________________________________________ Please avoid sending me Word, Excel or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
