Stipe Tolj, >So, how about giving a concret example on how you would do certain issues? Don't BS me. I have provided several patches to Kannel, and I did submit a working patch for a feature related to this issue, but about 2� hour after my submission, you flatly turned it down. Not much time for deeper contemplation there.
And, please, don't drag the discussion here down to whether that small patch is good or not. More important issues are at stake. They go way beyond the rejection of a single patch ie. should Kannel be a 'lowest common denominator' software or should it be a framework to handle several protocols as 'abstracted' as possible but with provisions for handling all aspects of a specific protocol. In my view the latter is a much more useful and challenging point of view. - J�rgen Thomsen
