Davy Chan wrote:

Ok. Let's break down the current situation.

 - SMPP and EMI both have extra parameters or options that can
   be passed back and forth between the SMSC Servers and the
   SMSC clients.
 - The extra parameters are proprietary to the SMPP or EMI
   specifications and cannot be abstracted to be used by other
   SMSC client implementation.
 - Kannel development Standard Operation Procedure is to keep
   SMSC specific features and capabilities out of the abstract
   representation of an SMS as declared by the SMS Msg structure.
 - Several people have expressed interest in exposing the SMSC
   specific capabilities so as to extract or inject pertinent
   information (like user_message_reference and network_error_code
   from SMPP).
 - How to provide the capability without breaking SOP?

good summary aggregation here Davy.

My proposed solution: Overload the billing info (binfo) with the SMSC
specific content.

 - For an MO or DLR SMS, have each SMSC client deal with the packaging
   of the info into a hexadecimal string.  Then, have the application
   depending on the info decode it.
   The optional parameter TLV (SMPP) or XSer TTLLDD (EMI) can be
   converted to their hexadecimal equivalent and forwarded to the
   application using the %B escape code.
 - For MT SMS, an application can embed the hexadecimal representatiion
   of the TLV or TTLLDD into the binfo. The SMSC client code will
   extract out the info and put it into the proprietary formats before
   submitting the SMS to the SMSC.

For those of us that do not need to have the extra stuff in the
binfo, have a configuration directive in the "group = smsc" that
"overload_binfo = false" to indicate to the SMSC client code not
to handle the extra stuff.

Opinions?

yep, we do this here at Wapme too (with binfo field overloading).

Actually it is a solution. But, in my personaly opinion it could be done "somehow" better. (where I still don't know explicetly how). But the proposed way is already in use here, and actually it "works".

This means we have one "magic" field (binfo) (or then even rename it appropriately) that transports all the optional parameter values from application layer side to smsc module.

Any more suggestions towards this?

Stipe

mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany

phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299

mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to