We don't disagree that much. Case a) obviously deserves a panic while case b) should have been a warning right from beginning.
Regards Joerg -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Aarno Syv�nen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. M�rz 2005 17:42 An: Pommnitz, J�rg Cc: Kannel list Betreff: Re: [RFC] --disable-panics configuration option There actually seems to two kinds of panic: a) Configuration errors. In this case, continuation really is impossible. b) Libs has some sanity checks that cause panic. If we just have a broken message, we must just ignore message, not panic. Aarno
