On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 19:09, "Pommnitz, J�rg" wrote: > But this just confirms what I wrote: such a panic is obviously > inappropriate and should be replaced by a warning. So, I stand by > what I wrote earlier: just audit the panics and make sure Kannel > panics in only *REALLY* hopeless situations. This would IMHO be > the Right Thing (TM) to do. > I fully agree here.
It is so bad that Kannel PANICs when it is not really a PANIC situation, but we should not make things worse by allowing it to continue when it really panics because of some unrecoverable problems (I recall rising this issue of 'too easily used panics' many months ago..) -- &Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket
