Hi Stipe, On 2/23/06, Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, > > two commits from my side for today: > > 2006-02-23 Stipe Tolj <stolj at kannel.org> > * wap/wtp.c: fixing bug #310, causing wapbox to panic while gwlist_append() > produces an assertion error if a malformed WTP datagram is tried to be > processes and we try to send an RcvError PDU deducing the TID value from > the WTP datagram, causing us to push the WAPEvent into a wrong list. > > This was causing wapbox to panic on a high-loaded system. Now we're supposed > to > consider us immunic for bogus WTP data. We simply don't reply to the WTP > initiator. >
Is this realted to PANIC's like this: 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: gwlib/list.c:502: lock: Assertion `list != NULL' failed. 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox(gw_panic+0x16b) [0x80d2b8a] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox [0x80d1a94] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox(gwlist_append+0x11) [0x80d0eec] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox(gwlist_produce+0x14) [0x80d1782] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox(wtp_initiator_dispatch_event+0x17) [0x80a7f8e] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox(wap_dispatch_datagram+0x11c) [0x808606c] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox(main+0x45e) [0x805bafd] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xc6) [0x4bcde6] 2006-02-23 09:42:46 [7958] [0] PANIC: /usr/local/sbin/wapbox [0x8059e4d] This has happenned before, and again now with the "Kannel wapbox version cvs-20060223 starting up" version.
