Thanks Alex

It will be most useful to have it in place.

Regards

Ben
On 17 Jan 2007, at 10:15, Alexander Malysh wrote:

Hi Ben,

no sorry, I did not managed to do it. I will try to do it this week.

Am 17.01.2007, 10:48 Uhr, schrieb Ben Suffolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

no you miss the point. ack_success and ac_failed are the final states and therefor bearerbox drops these messages from the store and queue. When I commited this patch I told that it misses ack_failed_tmp that is used for the purpose you describe. That means when bearerbox receive ack with ack_failed_tmp (temporarely) bearerbox will then do retry for this message.
I will try to merge this bit this week.

Hi Alex,

Just wondering if you managed to merge in the code for the retry from bearerbox to smsbox when smsbox responds with ack_failed_tmp?

Regards

Ben







--
Thanks,
Alex




Reply via email to