patch commited to cvs.
Am 22.01.2007, 10:44 Uhr, schrieb Ben Suffolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Alex,
Patch looks good, I've tested on my development servers and its
working very well. Thank You.
So thats a vote from me on a commit. (is that +1 I should say? I
never quite followed how the voting is supposed to work)
Regards
Ben
On 19 Jan 2007, at 16:47, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi Ben,
attached simple patch implements resend of MO/DLR messages if some
box sent nack with ack_failed_tmp status.
Comments please?
Am 18.01.2007, 11:50 Uhr, schrieb Ben Suffolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Thanks Alex
It will be most useful to have it in place.
Regards
Ben
On 17 Jan 2007, at 10:15, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi Ben,
no sorry, I did not managed to do it. I will try to do it this week.
Am 17.01.2007, 10:48 Uhr, schrieb Ben Suffolk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
no you miss the point. ack_success and ac_failed are the final
states and therefor bearerbox drops these messages from the
store and queue. When I commited this patch I told that it
misses ack_failed_tmp that is used for the purpose you
describe. That means when bearerbox receive ack with
ack_failed_tmp (temporarely) bearerbox will then do retry for
this message.
I will try to merge this bit this week.
Hi Alex,
Just wondering if you managed to merge in the code for the retry
from bearerbox to smsbox when smsbox responds with ack_failed_tmp?
Regards
Ben
--Thanks,
Alex
--
Thanks,
Alex
<bb_boxc-tmp-nack.patch>
Ben Suffolk
CTO
Zygo Communications
Switchboard: + 44 (8) 444 999 555
Mobile: +44 (0)7973 369097
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This e-mail including any attachments is confidential and may be
legally privileged. If you have received it in error please advise
the sender immediately by return email and then delete it from your
system. The unauthorised use, distribution, copying or alteration of
this email is strictly forbidden. If you need assistance please
contact us on + 448444 999 555
--
Thanks,
Alex
